Political goals and corporate carewash

Marcus Rashford is challenging neoliberal framings of poverty. We should call him a hero, argues Siobhan McGuirk – without letting his sponsors off the hook

December 20, 2020 · 4 min read
Billboard by Davo Howarth in Boothstown, Greater Manchester

Marcus Rashford deserves all the plaudits he gets this year. Even if the BBC rules that successfully taking on the PM is less evidence of ‘sports personality’ than a predictable Formula 1 victory. A 23-year-old professional footballer has relentlessly demanded more than temporary government measures to address child poverty. So far, he looks to be winning.

His personal story is not only an indictment of this government, or even its austerity-touting coalition predecessor, however. Rashford joined the Manchester United Academy a year earlier than is usual specifically so that he could eat well. That was 2009, under Prime Minister Gordon Brown. Born in 1997, we must not forget that Rashford is a child of New Labour.

Some leftists have been squeamish about a millionaire being hailed for ‘charity work’, overlooking the clear politics of the discourse he kick-started. He is wise to say his work is ‘not political’ – a young, working-class black man explicitly slamming the government would attract censure, not support. Nonetheless, he has assertively rejected Conservative narratives about individual ‘responsibility’. His mother’s hard work has matched his own, Rashford stresses, explaining clearly that the struggle of millions of people to stay above the poverty line is a social, not parental, failing. Repudiating neoliberalism, however imperfectly, is not apolitical.

Qualms that his calls for everyone to ‘pitch in’ echoed Conservative ‘big society’ rhetoric have also been overstated, but do point to a longstanding tension between state and community provisions of aid. Before the government’s quiet U-turn on free school meals, and before Rashford elevated their platform through four million social media followers, people nationwide were already packing lunches and dinners, and filling food bank shelves. They were doing so long before the pandemic hit.

Repudiating neoliberalism, however imperfectly, is not apolitical

Mutual aid is in the spotlight now, but it has been central to community organising and survival for centuries. As Red Pepper co-editor Amardeep Singh Dhillon wrote earlier this year, the challenge is to create radically equitable distributions of resources at the local level while also pressuring the state to follow suit. Against the odds, a young sportsman has demonstrated, potentially, the utility of that approach.

The rush of big brands to ‘join forces’ with Rashford is good reason for pause, however. The pandemic has prompted corporations to demonstrate their ‘caring’ credentials. Concern for public – read: consumer – wellbeing has displaced climate action and assertions that black lives matter as the latest must-have in corporate social responsibility advertising. Your bank is here for you, if you need to talk… about managing your borrowing. IKEA wants you to stay home… in ones it designed. Tesco celebrates families cooking over conference call… ingredients available in store. McDonald’s merrily encourages social distancing… but denies its staff sick leave and PPE.

Cynicism is justified. After all, marketing agency execs have warned clients to strategically embrace ‘acts not ads’, lest customers sense insincerity. If advertisers’ responses to coronavirus are serving society, it’s only because their messaging is clearer than government guidelines. Meanwhile, a rogue’s gallery of companies directly responsible for in-work poverty – Deliveroo chief among them – have flocked to ‘carewash’ their rap-sheets by supporting Rashford’s campaign. They know newsworthy donations turn more heads than billboards. We just need to remember: Marcus is the hero – not his corporate sponsors.

Siobhan McGuirk is a Red Pepper editor

This column first appeared in Issue 230: Struggles for Truth. Subscribe today to get great content hot off the press!

Bank Job directors Daniel and Hilary

Review – Bank Job

Jake Woodier reviews a new documentary film that brings heist aesthetics to a story of debt activism

How business benefits from Brexit

Brexit was declared done a month ago, the complex process of EU trade deal negotiations has just begun. In the second of a two-part series, Jamie Gough and John Kirby analyse why business will benefit from Brexit

Love Island stars advertising various products

That’s advertainment: reality TV and product placement

Sophie Benson explores the insidious role of unethical advertising in reality TV – and in the offscreen careers of its stars

Autism and performative awareness

As autistic people become more visible in public life, Errol Kerr examines how brands are seeking to repackage themselves as ‘autism friendly'

Should the left care about blockchain technology?

Despite its utopian promises of digital democracy, Thomas Redshaw argues socialists should be wary of embracing blockchain technology

Frontline workers and Covid-19: support staff and the neoliberal university

Max O’Donnell-Savage explains how university support staff are forced to risk their lives – while ensuring campuses are 'Covid-19 secure' for students