Companies profit from ‘flat pack’ schools

Mary Compton describes how big corporations are profiting from some of the world’s poorest schools

October 17, 2014 · 3 min read

Whatever is a ‘school in a box’? According to giant education corporation Pearson, it’s everything you need to run a school, from teacher training to testing and curricular software, all in a handy flat pack. Pearson has marketed its boxed schools in many southern countries, and with the advent of free schools in the UK is negotiating to offer the same privatised package here.

In Kenya, a chain of ‘low fee’ private schools called Bridge International Academies, in which Pearson has a stake, use schools in a box. And although the name refers to the box of pre-scripted lessons provided to the teachers (mostly unqualified and working for poverty pay), it might as well refer to the school buildings, which are uncannily box-like, corrugated tin sheds. In Brazil, it’s the name given to Pearson’s Sistema franchise – a standardising system that ensures that all children in the sistema are doing exactly the same things.

There are huge profits to be made from the education ‘industry’. As Rupert Murdoch put it in 2010, ‘When it comes to K-12 education, we see a $500 billion sector in the US alone that is waiting desperately to be transformed by big breakthroughs.’ And indeed, thanks to the US government’s corporate education ‘reforms’ covering for-profit charter schools, standardised testing and performance related pay, outfits such as Murdoch’s education arm Amplify are already securing that $500 billion.

UNESCO and the Brookings Institute have set up the Learning Metrics Taskforce to ‘improve learning outcomes for children and youth worldwide’. Co-chaired by Sir Michael Barber, chief education adviser to Pearson, its main focus is the collection of ‘big data’ so that schools, teachers and teaching can be standardised, judged, compared and if found wanting sacked or closed down. To collect data you need software and printed material – for testing, for standardised curricular materials and for all manner of box‑ticking.

For companies such as Pearson, it is a win/win situation: they profit from the software systems to collect such data, and they rubbish public schooling and justify replacing it with profit-making private schools. They also have control over the curriculum to ensure that children are taught to be the kind of flexible and quiescent workers that corporations require.

Most of us are aware of the struggles of teachers and communities in the UK and US against cuts, testing, performance-related pay and the whole playlist of corporate education ‘reform’. What fewer people are conscious of is that the same struggle is being waged by teachers and their unions in even harsher conditions all over the global South.pearson

photo of empty school desks and large window in classroom

This is how we build a National Education Service in the UK

Chloe Tomlinson lays out the battle lines for a more egalitarian, democratic and holistic education system. Essential reading ahead of The World Transformed education sessions

What happens if a university fails?

David Ridley reflects on the Augar Review

Governments fixate on STEM education – so why won’t they listen to scientists on climate change?

Governments could do well to learn from school students, writes 17-year-old Climate Striker Cate Davies

Let’s harness the power of political education

We need political education to build a confident, fighting movement writes Isaac Kneebone-Hopkins, an organiser for Bristol Transformed.

The rise of the student worker

The student population today is unrecognisable from that of a generation or more ago, writes Matt Myers. And it is central to any socialist project for the future.

What can academics learn from the Lucas Plan?

With the right organising and the right plan, UCU workers can transform universities from within. By David Ridley