<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Women&#8217;s Library occupation: fighting the cuts on International Women&#8217;s Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redpepper.org.uk/womens-library-occupation-fighting-the-cuts-on-international-womens-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redpepper.org.uk/womens-library-occupation-fighting-the-cuts-on-international-womens-day/</link>
	<description>Red Pepper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 17:39:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Summers</title>
		<link>http://www.redpepper.org.uk/womens-library-occupation-fighting-the-cuts-on-international-womens-day/#comment-169440</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Summers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redpepper.org.uk/?p=9579#comment-169440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is a travesty of the truth to say that LSE &#039;plans to incorporate the archives into its own library, shutting down public access and eroding the library&#039;s independence&#039;.  No institution had the will or the capacity to run The Women&#039;s Library in its purpose-built premises, which is very sad.  BUT LSE is going to enormous trouble and expense to dedicate a reading room+exhibition space+open-shelf access to TWL@LSE, and its four full-time archivists will be able to deal with the backlong which for years has blocked access to too many of TWL&#039;s archival collections. Reader access to all the collections will be on the same terms as at TWL and other public institions such as London Metropolitan Archives (the former Greater London Record Office) which all sorts of non-academic groups and individuals use with no trouble at all (actually, rather more than was the case at TWL)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a travesty of the truth to say that LSE &#8216;plans to incorporate the archives into its own library, shutting down public access and eroding the library&#8217;s independence&#8217;.  No institution had the will or the capacity to run The Women&#8217;s Library in its purpose-built premises, which is very sad.  BUT LSE is going to enormous trouble and expense to dedicate a reading room+exhibition space+open-shelf access to TWL@LSE, and its four full-time archivists will be able to deal with the backlong which for years has blocked access to too many of TWL&#8217;s archival collections. Reader access to all the collections will be on the same terms as at TWL and other public institions such as London Metropolitan Archives (the former Greater London Record Office) which all sorts of non-academic groups and individuals use with no trouble at all (actually, rather more than was the case at TWL)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.460 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-09-19 01:30:51 -->