We must have a far-reaching inquiry into police spying

Kevin Blowe responds to the latest revelations that police spied on community groups and campaigns for justice for those that died custody
25 June 2013

United Friends and Family Campaign procession

United Friends and Family Campaign procession. Credit: Newham Monitoring Project

Today’s new development in the long-running exposure of undercover police targeting campaigners has suddenly became very personal. The Guardian reported that covert officers from the former Special Demonstration Squad had spied on a number of organisations concerned with corruption and harassment within the Metropolitan Police, including the east London community group Newham Monitoring Project (NMP), and on justice campaigns for people who had died in custody. I have been an activist for NMP for 23 years and from 1997 to 2007 was the secretary of the United Families and Friends Campaign, an umbrella group of custody death families. It seems likely my name appeared in some of the secret so-called ‘intelligence’ reports.

I’m disturbed that NMP was targeted but not entirely shocked. In some ways it might be seen as a positive reflection on our effectiveness in exposing cases of police misconduct and how worried senior officers had become about the damage that the actions of some of their officers was inflicting on the Met's reputation. I certainly know the police have never been able to get their heads around what motivates independent grassroots activism: how campaigns emerge from practical casework rather than, say, an attempt to recruit people to a party and how supporting individuals and families suffering injustice makes the anger that drives a desire for answers feel very personal.

Furthermore, the fact that a decision was made to spy on an organisation whose events were open to the public and whose activities were reported in great detail in our annual reports and publicity says more about the Metropolitan police than it does about NMP: it illustrates the deep level of resistance to accountability within London’s police during the period when the Special Demonstration Squad were snooping around our activities.

However, I’m appalled and angry too, that campaigns NMP advised and supported that were set up and sustained by bereaved families struggling for justice for their loved ones after a death in police custody – always in the face of overwhelming hostility from every part of the criminal justice system – may have been targeted for covert surveillance, for no other reason than to try and undermine them. I can only imagine that, in the absence of any actual ‘plotting’ by these campaigns, undercover officers were simply busy trying to find out more about families' legal strategies or looking for gossip and rumour that they could use to smear ordinary people forced into extraordinary circumstances by grief and the need to find the truth.

On top of the allegations of serious sexual misconduct and betrayal by undercover police and the stories of identities stolen from dead babies, the shameful targeting of the bereaved now means the case for an independent public inquiry is overwhelming. The Home Secretary’s insistence that the current investigation by Derbyshire’s Chief Constable is adequate lacks any credibility. We need a far-reaching and robust inquiry to find out what so-called ‘intelligence’ was gathered by officers, who ordered the surveillance and how it was used. Just as importantly, we urgently need to know to what extent the successors to the Special Demonstration Squad, such as the National Domestic Extremism Unit, are still secretly targeting campaigners.

Personally, I and other NMP activists also really want to know the fake identity and the real name of the officer that we may have inadvertently worked with in good faith. I want to know what kind of person pretends to support campaigns for justice but instead was secretly working to try and prevent the truth from ever emerging. For the sake of the transparency and accountability we have always demanded, the Metropolitan police owe all of us that, especially all the people we have supported over the years.



Kevin BloweKevin Blowe is a community centre worker and activist in Newham, east London.


 

Donate to build socialist media

Right now, with the rise of Jeremy Corbyn, there is a real possibility of a resurgence of the left in Britain. With mainstream media showing clear bias against Corbyn, this new left movement urgently needs its own strong voices.

Welcome to Liverpool - a heartland of the rebel cause

Thousands of activists will arrive in Liverpool this month for the Labour Party Conference and its fringe events. Jenny Nelson recommends places to visit and introduces the local political scene

Housing and land activists to join forces

In the run up to a November event Robin Grey makes the case for urban and rural communities to work together to tackle land rights, ownership and usage

The Train Gate story is a product of desperation

Alex Richardson-Price observes the pressing need for a character assassination, by any means necessary, of Jeremy Corbyn.




Clive P 26 June 2013, 01.36

I thought it interesting that no mention has been made by the Guardian/Observer that they have carried some of the ‘Peter Francis’ story before.

The unnamed former cop who gave them info for a 2010 story was clearly him http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/mar/14/undercover-policeman-infiltrated-violent-activists

Which raises several interesting points such as – Why was the ‘dirt on Stephen Lawrence’s family story’ not carried then?

Those who were the targets of his work dismissed several of his claims in 2010.


o 26 June 2013, 15.26

ACAB forever.


Merrick 27 June 2013, 15.21

The state cannot do a believable inquiry into a massive state cover up. From Widgery to Hutton to Hillsborough, we’ve seen what can happen. With 40 years and over 100 officers involved, we have barely begun to dig into the undercover political policing. The Hillsborough Independent Panel shows how to succeed where others fail.

Clive, Francis is “officer A”, but it appears to have taken several years for him to be trusting of the journalists and get confidence as a whistleblower before he would use his real name or be specific about his targets. It’s understandable – he did that first interview before Mark Kennedy was outed & none of the spies had told their story. To do it unprompted ( and unlike Max Clifford’s client Kennedy, unpaid) suggests he acts out of genuine conscience.


j_cee 23 July 2013, 07.19

The smear/disinformation campaign that targeted the Lawrence family and others speaks volumes about the length police will go. Agree entirely that the state can’t be trusted to investigate this. It is a wake up call. Organizers need to be more pro-active in outing bad acts.

Here in Canada there was extensive undercover infiltration during G8/G20 meetings in Ontario and in the lead-up to Winter Olympics. Undercover cops spent a year and half infiltrating community organizations in Ontario, Quebec and BC.



Comments are now closed on this article.






Red Pepper · 44-48 Shepherdess Walk, London N1 7JP · +44 (0)20 7324 5068 · office[at]redpepper.org.uk
Advertise · Press · Donate
For subscriptions enquiries please email subs@redpepper.org.uk