<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Localism Bill &#8211; who benefits?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redpepper.org.uk/the-localism-bill-who-benefits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redpepper.org.uk/the-localism-bill-who-benefits/</link>
	<description>Red Pepper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 17:39:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: iniref</title>
		<link>http://www.redpepper.org.uk/the-localism-bill-who-benefits/#comment-2483</link>
		<dc:creator>iniref</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redpepper.org.uk/?p=3068#comment-2483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &quot;right to call a referendum on local issues&quot; is an important inclusion in the Localism Bill, which risks being rejected by critics of the Bill, perhaps thereby &quot;throwing the baby out with the bathwater&quot;.

In principle the right to citizens&#039; referendum implies the introduction of partial direct democracy and the acknowledgment of electoral sovereignty in governance. However, the Con/Libdem coalition has avoided going so far -- they declare that the result of a citizens&#039; referendum will not be legally binding on the local authority. Realising that their efforts could be wasted, citizens may refrain from using the referendum tool at all.

With an effective citizens&#039; referendum which can lead to a binding decision, many of the worthy causes mentioned in Bob Colenutt&#039;s article could be tackled or assisted by &quot;local people&quot;.

Pressure should be put on the Coalition and Mr. Pickles to improve the proposed referendum rules and so too the quality of local democracy in their Bill.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;right to call a referendum on local issues&#8221; is an important inclusion in the Localism Bill, which risks being rejected by critics of the Bill, perhaps thereby &#8220;throwing the baby out with the bathwater&#8221;.</p>
<p>In principle the right to citizens&#8217; referendum implies the introduction of partial direct democracy and the acknowledgment of electoral sovereignty in governance. However, the Con/Libdem coalition has avoided going so far &#8212; they declare that the result of a citizens&#8217; referendum will not be legally binding on the local authority. Realising that their efforts could be wasted, citizens may refrain from using the referendum tool at all.</p>
<p>With an effective citizens&#8217; referendum which can lead to a binding decision, many of the worthy causes mentioned in Bob Colenutt&#8217;s article could be tackled or assisted by &#8220;local people&#8221;.</p>
<p>Pressure should be put on the Coalition and Mr. Pickles to improve the proposed referendum rules and so too the quality of local democracy in their Bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>