Libya after Gaddafi: ‘The continuity is striking’

The National Transitional Council’s ‘new Libya’ is all too familiar, writes Tommy Miles
December 2011

Mustafa Abdul Jalil, Gaddafi’s minister of justice and now chairman of the National Transitional Council

At the end of October, 51 voting representatives took part in the election by the National Transitional Council (NTC) of the academic and businessman Abdul al-Raheem al-Qeeb as Libya’s new interim prime minister. But many have never been publicly identified and no complete record of their votes is public. Around a dozen members make up the NTC’s executive committee, with most given ministerial-like portfolios. The NTC chairman, Mustafa Abdul Jalil, plays the role of figurehead and shares executive powers with the committee chair. Until his recent – likely temporary – retreat from power, this was the former interim prime minister, Mahmoud Jibril. The post-war NTC road-map is vague, with April 2012 elections and a constitutional convention promised beforehand.

The great continuity (only minus the Gaddafis) between the NTC now and pre-revolutionary Libya is striking. Libya has witnessed a political revolution, not a social or an economic one, and many of the leading actors remain the same.

The first revolutionary leaders came from the dissidents, the diaspora, and the Islamists. Among the earliest were future NTC vice chair Abdul Hafiz Ghoga and ‘minister for youth’ Fatih Turbel. These two dissident lawyers organised the families of the 1,200 Islamist – or accused Islamist – prisoners killed at Tripoli’s Abu Salim jail in 1996. The march that sparked the revolution was organised by these families to protest at the arrest of Turbel after he led an earlier anniversary vigil.

That 15 February protest was watched closely by an ad hoc network of educated, ‘wired’ Libyans abroad, energised by the Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions. As demonstrations spread, news was collected by phone calls and texts to diaspora Libyans, spread to the western press, and back to Libya. The actions of Libyans living abroad were crucial to the rising’s survival.

By March there were two collections of neighbourhood committees trying to run and defend liberated Benghazi. Combined, they became the NTC. One was headed by Abdul Hafiz Ghoga, the other by Mustafa Abdul Jalil. Abdul Jalil was surely more prominent as he was Gaddafi’s minister of justice, dispatched to his native region to calm the protests that he instead joined.

As a judge under the old regime, Jalil’s stubborn refusal to follow diktat or prosecute political opponents made him a hero. So it was a surprise, not only that he survived, but that Muammar Gaddafi’s heir, Saif al-Islam Gaddafi, made him justice minister in 2007.

After 2001, the Gaddafis set out to welcome western capital while avoiding western militarism. This eventually included controlled demonstrations of political openness. Saif was not foolish enough to give men like Abdul Jalil real power. Libya remained a state tightly ruled by the Gaddafi clan. But the 2007 burst of reform appointments is part of the pre-history of the NTC. They included Mahmoud Jibril, who was made head of the Libyan National Economic Development Board by Saif, and future NTC justice minister Mohammed Allagui, who was ‘human rights spokesman’ for Saif’s Gaddafi Foundation. Even critics of the NTC liberals have their skeletons. Sheikh Ali al-Salabi, who once called Jibril an ‘extremist secularist’, was Saif’s negotiator with former Islamist prisoners during their 2010 ‘rehabilitation’.

Most of those who rose in Saif’s reforms were like Jibril: fluent in international diplomacy and business, they had spent decades in the west, or had run businesses in the more liberal Gulf states. Their model is western-facing oil rentier-based capitalist development. They were the natural leaders of a new Libya.

When Jibril stepped down, many expected oil and finance minister Ali Tarhouni to lead the NTC into elections. Tarhouni, a former Seattle MBA professor, brought an ability to translate the NTC’s realities to westerners and a willingness to discuss its conflicts and failures. His denunciation of foreign, allegedly Qatari, arms shipments to militias might have been his undoing, and he was sidelined for the ‘unknown’ Abdel Rahim Al Keeb.

While he is set to be a marginal individual, Al Keeb’s background gives us a foretaste of the emerging Libya. A US‑trained engineer, he runs a Qatar-based oil industry engineering company, with large Libyan contracts since 2005. Al Keeb was no dissident. He is a rich man with extensive western, Gulf, and Libyan business contacts and no particular animus outside Gaddafi’s inner circle. As scion of a powerful old family from west of Tripoli, he has a status that predates both the revolution and Gaddafi. Al Keeb also bankrolled Tripoli-based rebels, whose military councils are the NTC’s greatest headache.

The coming Libya will be familiar to the old elites. The dissidents and intellectuals never really had a chance.

Tommy Miles writes at


Ken Saro-Wiwa and the power of resistance

On the 20th anniversary of Saro-Wiwa’s murder, Nigerian activist Ken Henshaw describes how his struggle put justice at the centre of environmentalism

Burkina Faso: Liberation not looting

Firoze Manji argues that the recent uprising in Burkina Faso throws light on the debate around development, and calls for our solidarity, not charity

Culture and Revolution: The Pan-African Festival of Algiers

Hamza Hamouchene introduces the revolutionary documentary, The Pan-African Festival of Algiers 1969

nandra 20 December 2011, 04.05

None of the current NTC can run for elections. Elections will give the dissidents and intellectual all the chance they need. Stupid article.

radi saad from libya 20 December 2011, 09.46

you just lier
libya better now then before

radi saad from libya 20 December 2011, 09.48

now we can speak freely and we can damaned our writes so before was gadafiii regiam kill anyone ask for his right

radi saad from libya 20 December 2011, 09.50

go to the helll you just feel joulis of new libya

O 23 December 2011, 07.27

This is poorly researched article. they state Dr. El Keib owns a company it is well known he is only a professor even in the UAE. He never worked in Qatar his last job was at the Petroleum Institute as a Professor of Electrical Engineering.

Matt 29 December 2011, 06.29

The people are happy, they are enjoying their freedom, at least they get the chance to vote. I say good luck to them and nobody can say they didn’t earn it, sure they had some help, but not an invading army. That is the difference between Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya freedom was given to them, in Libya they earned it through sacrifice. It tastes different and it feels different.

Brian. O. 5 January 2012, 15.48

The first part of this article provides an interesting overview of the development of the NTC, but the second half draws a sweeping conclusion not substatnited by the facts. Tommy seems to see claiming a major shift in the nature of the NTC from an organisation reflecting the “dissidents, the diaspora, and the Islamists” to one that has a “striking continuity” with the Gaddafi regime. But, as he himself shows, former regime members were key figures in the NTC from the start. The recent appointment of an Interim Government has reduced their role, with Abdurrahim El Keib, the Interim PM, regarded by most analysts as a compromise technocratic figure. I certainly can’t find any great significanc, as Tommy suggests,in his appointment over Ali Tarhouni, who had strongly pro-US and free market views.
The really important development has been the decision of the Government to convene an elected Assembly to draw up the new constitution. This has already sparked off public debate on the issue of women’s representation, and we can be sure that there will be much more to follow. The left needs to break its bad habit of leaving the Libyan people out of the equation when discussing Libya.

Putka 7 January 2012, 02.09

New Libya = CIA colony

Stan 7 January 2012, 15.17

“The continuity is striking”? What nonsense. There were no warring factions in the old Libya. There was no xenophobia against black people in the old Libya. There were no gangs of armed hooligans roaming the streets.

Comments are now closed on this article.

Red Pepper · 44-48 Shepherdess Walk, London N1 7JP · +44 (0)20 7324 5068 · office[at]
Advertise · Press · Donate
For subscriptions enquiries please email