<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jeremy Hardy thinks&#8230; about genes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redpepper.org.uk/jeremy-hardy-thinks-about-genes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redpepper.org.uk/jeremy-hardy-thinks-about-genes/</link>
	<description>Red Pepper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 17:39:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.redpepper.org.uk/jeremy-hardy-thinks-about-genes/#comment-1617</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 20:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rpnew.nfshost.com/?p=2302#comment-1617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On this topic, nobody (including JH) ever gets beyond the point where if you don&#039;t believe in a god it&#039;s clearly stupid to educate children to do so, and where if you *do* then it doesn&#039;t make much sense to let such an apparently supreme fact be anything but supreme.  The whole point about being liberal, I take it, is the restriction of the state to matters of harm.  Belief in a god is not directly linked to any kind of harmful lifestyle (for the person thus inculcated or others around them), so I can&#039;t see how liberality would allow the state to act against it in any way.  If it&#039;s not liberal principles then it&#039;s a mere clash of opinion, in which case I stand as a liberal to defend each from the other equally.  Having said that, a totally mixed school (with *lots* of religions, not none) sounds like fantastic training for real life - but that&#039;s not to say the power of the state should make it so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On this topic, nobody (including JH) ever gets beyond the point where if you don&#8217;t believe in a god it&#8217;s clearly stupid to educate children to do so, and where if you *do* then it doesn&#8217;t make much sense to let such an apparently supreme fact be anything but supreme.  The whole point about being liberal, I take it, is the restriction of the state to matters of harm.  Belief in a god is not directly linked to any kind of harmful lifestyle (for the person thus inculcated or others around them), so I can&#8217;t see how liberality would allow the state to act against it in any way.  If it&#8217;s not liberal principles then it&#8217;s a mere clash of opinion, in which case I stand as a liberal to defend each from the other equally.  Having said that, a totally mixed school (with *lots* of religions, not none) sounds like fantastic training for real life &#8211; but that&#8217;s not to say the power of the state should make it so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.496 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-09-18 23:01:39 -->