Guardians of the future?
22 January 2012: Last week, Red Pepper was invited to the launch of a new report from the ‘Green House’ think tank about how to restructure our leading democratic institutions.
The report was authored by Rupert Read, the starting point of whose thinking is this question: ‘Democracy’ means ‘government by the people’, but who are ‘the people’?
Read argued that society exists over time and decisions taken today can have significant consequences for people yet to be born. His report argues that the interests of future generations should be formally represented within our existing parliamentary democracy. Building on the philosophies of Plato and of deliberative democracy, and on the precedent of Hungary’s innovative office of Ombudsman for Future Generations, Read’s report proposes the creation of a new legislative structure – ‘Guardians’ of Future Generations. The members of this body would be selected by ‘sortition’, as is current practice for jury service, in order to ensure independence from present-day party political interests.
The Guardians would have a power of veto over legislation that were likely to have substantial negative effects for society in the future, the right to review major administrative decisions which substantially affected future people and the power to initiate legislation to preserve the basic needs and interests of future people.
There has been extensive coverage of Read’s proposal: including in the Guardian, Telegraph, Open Democracy, Liberal Conspiracy, www.politics.co.uk and now Red Pepper. The House of Commons launch last week was attended by an extensive range of journalists, politicians and civil society representatives. Speakers at the launch included Caroline Lucas MP, Jon Cruddas MP, and Norman Baker MP (of the government). The Hungarian Ombudsman for Future Generations sent an explicit statement of support (for the proposal) to the meeting.
If you want to read Read’s report, here it is: http://www.greenhousethinktank.org/files/greenhouse/home/Guardians_inside_final.pdf
Race to the Line With John Carlos, one of the Mexico ‘68 podium protesters, on a speaking tour of Britain, Mark Perryman describes the continuing clash of race and the Games
Ex-ECB chief: ‘If parliaments do not give us what we want, we will annul them’ Leigh Phillips examines the response from former European Central Bank chief, Jean-Claude Trichet on how to solve the eurocrisis
UK Uncut’s Great London Street Party: The future’s not what it used to be… On Saturday 26 May, UK Uncut will be hosting the Great London street party of resistance
Who gets to see the Torch? Who gets to see the Games? As the torch relay comes to Britain, Mark Perryman, author of a new book on the Olympics, questions the claim of a Games for all
Media Reform rally (+ live stream), Thur 17th @ 6-8pm The Coordinating Committee for Media Reform, in conjunction with the Hacked Off campaign, will be hosting a public rally for Media Reform at Westminster Central Hall on the evening of 17th May.
What if loyalty hadn’t drained Ken of his maverick energy? Michael Calderbank examines the reasons behind Ken Livingstone's defeat in the London mayoral elections
Local Elections: The gift that wasn’t on the Tory wish list Anthony Arblaster discusses the ups and downs of the local election results, which came as an unwelcome surprise to some
So farewell then electors – we knew you once… A record low turnout for last week’s elections was probably the most significant outcome. Just 32 per cent bothered to vote – the lowest since 2000
Kettling police powers Kevin Blowe invites you to a conference on defending our fundamental liberties during the Olympics and beyond
Economic democracy: the next big left idea? Peter Tatchell says democratising economic decision-making is the key to a fairer society and to a more stable, responsible economy
Caught in the dragnet The controversial legal notion of ‘joint enterprise’ is being used against protesters and alleged gang members alike. Jon Robins reports
Jordan Valley: To exist is to resist Lorna Stephenson reports on a grass-roots campaign group challenging the Israeli occupation in the Jordan Valley
A different way of doing things Robin Murray explores the potential of co-ops to form the basis of an alternative economy
A bank worth backing Christopher Hird looks at how the Co-op Bank has fared in the financial crisis
One Million Climate Jobs: An interview with John Stewart Tom Robinson talks to the Chair of the Campaign Against Climate Change on how the creation of one million climate jobs could help save the economy and the environment
Red Pepper is a magazine of political rebellion and dissent, influenced by socialism, feminism and green politics. more »
Get a free sample copy of Red Pepper
Looking for an 'AAA-rated' investment?* Red Pepper has one for you.
Unlike most European economies, Red Pepper has a serious strategy for growth. We're recruting a politcal organiser to expand our readership and subscriber base. Help us raise the money to do so.
* Rated AAA for Anti-Austerity Activism
The UK's leading supplier of Fair Trade products
Get our email newsletter, with news, offers, updates and competitions.Become a Friend of Red Pepper
Help keep Red Pepper afloat with a regular donation
Watch films online
See free trailers and support Red Pepper by streaming the full films:
Cocaine Unwrapped
The War You Don't See
44-48 Shepherdess Walk, London N1 7JP
+44 (0)20 7324 5068
office[at]redpepper.org.uk
Without having had chance to read Rupert’s report in full, two immediate questions occur. How can the it be described as ‘democratic’ to appoint a jury to determine the interests of people who don’t yet exist, and for those people to have a veto over the decisions of elected representatives? Clearly our current democracy is inadequate to say the least, but deepening it would involve enagaging people in decisions in a more participative way. ‘Future generations’ would by definition be unable to take part in this.
Secondly, and perhaps more fundamentally, the climate crisis (to which this proposal is most obviously directed) is a result not of ‘short-sightedness’ on the part of politicians, but of the direct and indirect control of our societies by an unelected economic elite. Runaway climate change is essentially the consequence of capitalism. This seems like a technocratic ‘solution’ to a problem of economic power. Surely without a fundamental shift of power, no panel of psuedo-philosopher kings is going to make much difference?