<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Confronting the city</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redpepper.org.uk/confronting-the-city/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redpepper.org.uk/confronting-the-city/</link>
	<description>Red Pepper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 17:39:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pro bono publico</title>
		<link>http://www.redpepper.org.uk/confronting-the-city/#comment-24932</link>
		<dc:creator>pro bono publico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 13:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-24932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maurice Glasman is definitely on to something. He gets it. Market-liberalism, with its individualist, rational-egoist assumptions, needs to be confronted with a deep, socially-embeded humanism. 

Unfortunately, the Labour party does not understand Glasman, and Blue Labour is seen as a cynical plot to win the votes of the unreflective, socially conservative, tabloid-reading working class.   In the same way, Cameron and the Tories don&#039;t understand Philip Blond, whose &quot;Big Society&quot; idea became nothing more than a convenient cover for privatisation. 

This is because Glasman and Blond are both, essentially, arguing for a Christian Social economy.  Their whole line of argument only makes sense if you start with Aristotle and Aquinas, and if you know your Rerum Novarum from your Caritas in Veritate. None of this fits into the individualist, rationalist, utilitarian assumptions which is currently shared by both the Labour and Conservative parties.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maurice Glasman is definitely on to something. He gets it. Market-liberalism, with its individualist, rational-egoist assumptions, needs to be confronted with a deep, socially-embeded humanism. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, the Labour party does not understand Glasman, and Blue Labour is seen as a cynical plot to win the votes of the unreflective, socially conservative, tabloid-reading working class.   In the same way, Cameron and the Tories don&#8217;t understand Philip Blond, whose &#8220;Big Society&#8221; idea became nothing more than a convenient cover for privatisation. </p>
<p>This is because Glasman and Blond are both, essentially, arguing for a Christian Social economy.  Their whole line of argument only makes sense if you start with Aristotle and Aquinas, and if you know your Rerum Novarum from your Caritas in Veritate. None of this fits into the individualist, rationalist, utilitarian assumptions which is currently shared by both the Labour and Conservative parties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robertissimo</title>
		<link>http://www.redpepper.org.uk/confronting-the-city/#comment-12942</link>
		<dc:creator>Robertissimo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-12942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[genial politics lecturer??? what with coming up with the idea of &quot;bluelabour&quot;? even Redpepper is taken in by the conman! Oh my god, this is a bad dream...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>genial politics lecturer??? what with coming up with the idea of &#8220;bluelabour&#8221;? even Redpepper is taken in by the conman! Oh my god, this is a bad dream&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.606 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-09-18 20:59:42 -->