A glance through Michael Mansfield's cases - many resulting in the release of innocent people from serving jail sentences for crimes that they did not commit - confirms that he's earned his reputation. Moreover, Mansfield understands that courtroom victories themselves are never going to change the world, and places himself squarely within political movements for radical change.
After training, Mansfield very quickly became a defence lawyer, specialising initially in drugs possession cases and supplementing his practice with volunteer work at addict centres. It seems to have been this experience that radicalised him. He has drawn on John Stuart Mill to argue that acts which do not encroach on the life or liberty of someone else should not be criminalised. Mansfield is also known for developing bonds with his clients and keeping in touch with them. As a result he knows the human cost of miscarriages of justice.
His career has included some of the most famous trials in the past 30 years. He's best known for the tenacious legal and political campaigns that exonerated the Birmingham Six, the Bridgewater Three, the Tottenham Three, the Cardiff Three, Judith Ward and Angela Cannings, after having served years for crimes that they had not committed.
In the legal profession, he is best known for his meticulous questioning of forensic evidence and his challenging of assumptions. Mansfield's successful appeal of the Angela Cannings case - in which she had been convicted of murdering her children after the genetic predisposition of her children to infant mortality was overlooked - set a legal precedent against such cases being swayed by statistical evidence alone.
After the death of Stephen Lawrence, Mansfield and Imran Khan had to develop new legal skills. Suddenly these defence lawyers became prosecutors, trying to convict Lawrence's murderers when the police had failed to do so. They eventually held the police and the murderers accountable through the Macpherson Inquiry, rather than in the courtroom. Significantly, they forced a retired high court judge, well-known for his illiberal opinions, to understand and uphold the concept of institutional racism.
The book is a riveting read. It's full of great detail about the process of cross-examination, the fallibility of scientific evidence and the human stories behind the legal details. Mansfield says he's retiring from legal practice, but let's wait and see.
Memoirs of a Radical Lawyer is available for purchase here.
Contradictory Dickens On the bicentenary of Charles Dickens' birth, Terry Eagleton looks at the contradictions of the man and his work
Tweetin’ ’bout a revolution: Paul Mason interview Newsnight’s Paul Mason, author of a new book on the revolts sweeping the world, speaks to Red Pepper
Catch 22: war satire still bites in the age of Fallujah and Helmand Catch 22, by Joseph Heller, reviewed by Matt Owen
An ‘excess of democracy’: what two generations of radicals can learn from each other The philosophy and experience of 1960s/70s radical movements are in several ways complementary to the ideas of the direct action movements of today. Hilary Wainwright examines the possibility of forging a new kind of political economy by learning from the best of both
N30 and after: was that it? A debate on the public sector strikes Gregor Gall analyses the 30 November strikes. With a response by Heather Wakefield
Audio: Rebellious Media Conference Exclusive podcast with Dan Hind, James Curran, Zahera Harb
Leanne Wood: Why I’m standing for the Plaid Cymru leadership Leanne Wood AM sets out a socialist vision for Wales.
After Durban: All talked out? The UN climate talks in Durban followed a familiar script of inaction. Oscar Reyes asks if activists should still be focusing attention on them
Red Pepper is a magazine of political rebellion and dissent, influenced by socialism, feminism and green politics. more »
Get our email newsletter, with news, offers, updates and competitions.