This year, global summit counter-mobilisations are coming back into vogue for the left. They were an ever-present feature of the alter-globalisation movement, but it seemed their time had passed as activists began to favour more localised, decentralised tactics, policing became more effective
and the media lost interest.
However, in the face of a series of summits of critical importance to the future direction of global politics, this year activist networks across the world are coming together once again. And the old debates surrounding the efficacy of summit mobilisation are back too.
'Summit season' begins on 2 April, when Barack Obama will make his first presidential trip to Europe to attend the G20 summit in London. Delegates from the most powerful nations in the world are coming to discuss how to give capitalism the kiss of life.
While those inside focus on financial reform, the protesters on the streets outside the summit will march under the banner of 'Put People First: Jobs, Justice and Climate'. Others are seeking to intervene more directly. The Camp for Climate Action plans to pitch tents in London's financial district on 1 April to highlight the role of the 'fossil and financial fools' in causing both climate change and the economic crisis.
Many of the G20 delegates will jet off to mainland Europe the day the summit ends - and the protests will follow them. This time leaders will be meeting for a Nato conference held jointly in Strasbourg and Baden-Baden. As well as discussing escalating the war in Afghanistan, delegates will also be celebrating Nato's 60th birthday. A large demonstration is being organised by unions, NGOs and the anti-war movement (including the Stop the War Coalition and CND), and decentralised direct action will be staged to impede the summit.
The momentum will continue into the summer. The G8, the focus of dramatic past counter-mobilisations, will be hosted in Italy, on the remote island of Lampedusa. Although Italian activists are principally organising around education and anti-racism issues at present, a coming together of southern Europe's radical left networks is to be expected. Meanwhile, a series of climate camps modelled on the UK's will take place across northern Europe.
Finally, in December, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change will meet in Copenhagen for the 'COP-15', to negotiate a successor to the Kyoto treaty, which is set to expire in 2012. Environmentalists across the globe are already discussing how to intervene. The debate is split between those wishing to pressure delegates into making the 'right choices' and those seeking to shut down the summit entirely. Klimax, the Copenhagen-based organising group, proposes a 'mass action concept' to bridge the divide. Arguing that 'a good deal is better than no deal - but no deal is way better than a bad one', Klimax has called a counter-summit to run in parallel and inform actions.
Similar debates are being played out across the different counter-mobilisations, usually involving a split between the coalitions of NGOs and unions organising large demonstrations and radical groups planning civil disobedience and more militant interference.
Even if this year's counter-summit mobilisations successfully encompass a broad political spectrum, many question the efficacy of this form of protest. 'Summit-hopping', as critics call it, can sap energy from long-term local campaigns and focus it on mega-spectacles that produce questionable concrete results. Proponents, though, see counter-summits as inspiring symbolic manifestations of resistance, and opportunities to reach out to other social groups.
However we on the left intervene, we must ensure that our message is relevant. Now more than ever, society needs a coherent and viable alternative to 'business as usual'. If done well, this year's mobilisations might just provide the necessary 'jump start' for serious oppositional responses to the ecological and economic crises.
Broader horizons Mike Marqusee asks: are the emerging forms of resistance up to the challenge?
An ‘excess of democracy’: what two generations of radicals can learn from each other Hilary Wainwright examines the possibility of forging a new kind of political economy by learning from the best of both today's radical movements and those of the 60s and 70s
Organise! City cleaners fight for a living wage Michael Pooler reports on the struggle of cleaners in the heart of London's financial district
The state of the movement The G20 protests have certainly left their mark, though not in a way anyone predicted - and the ensuing debate on policing was long overdue. But, Andy Bowman asks, did the protests manage to unite the left?
Death in the City Contrary to media reports, people did not pelt the police as the man who died during the G20 protests was being taken out. Andrew Kendle reports from Wednesday night's protest frontline
Climate crunch The economic crisis is leading to falling carbon emissions - so why is it not good for the climate? By Oscar Reyes
Jordan Valley: To exist is to resist Lorna Stephenson reports on a grass-roots campaign group challenging the Israeli occupation in the Jordan Valley
A different way of doing things Robin Murray explores the potential of co-ops to form the basis of an alternative economy
A bank worth backing Christopher Hird looks at how the Co-op Bank has fared in the financial crisis
One Million Climate Jobs: An interview with John Stewart Tom Robinson talks to the Chair of the Campaign Against Climate Change on how the creation of one million climate jobs could help save the economy and the environment
Co-operatise the state? Can the co-op movement be one source of alternatives to marketisation? Hilary Wainwright explores
Red Pepper is a magazine of political rebellion and dissent, influenced by socialism, feminism and green politics. more »
Get a free sample copy of Red Pepper
Get our email newsletter, with news, offers, updates and competitions.