Get Red Pepper's email newsletter. Enter your email address to receive our latest articles, updates and news.

×

American Health

As an American, I watch in astonishment when other countries debate whether to import anything resembling American health insurance companies into their health care systems.

April 1, 2006
6 min read

For decades, US per capita health care costs have been roughly double those of the rest of the industrialized world even though we leave one-sixth of our people uninsured. In the year 2002, the US spent $5,267 per person on health care. Switzerland, which had the next most expensive system on the planet, spent $3,446. The UK spent just $2,160.

But despite the fact that the UK spends only 40 per cent as much as the US and still insures 100 percent of her people, and despite the fact that Americans are furious with their health insurance industry, the Labour Party has decided to transplant American healthcare corporations, including United Health Care and Kaiser Permanent, into the body of the National Health Service. I predict you will rue the day you let this happen.

In America these and other companies have operated as “health maintenance organizations” (HMOs), and have made a mess of the healthcare system. HMOs are insurance companies that influence doctors with two tools – financial incentives and “utilization review.” The financial incentives encourage doctors to deny services to their patients. Utilization review (UR) means an employee of the HMO vetoes or amends a decision made by a doctor and patient. To enhance the leverage of the financial-incentive and UR tools, HMOs often restrict the doctors patients can see in order to be able to funnel more patients to doctors on the staff of or on contract with

the HMO. An HMO that insures, for example, 30 per cent of a clinic’s patients is far more likely to work its will over the clinic than an HMO that insures only 5 per cent of the clinic’s patients.

America’s great experiment with HMOs began in the early 1970s, peaked in the mid-1990s, and crashed in the latter half of the 1990s. The experiment failed because HMO advocates diagnosed the cause of American health care inflation incorrectly, and, on the basis of that incorrect diagnosis, devised an awful solution. HMO advocates claimed inflation in American health care costs was due primarily to overuse of medical care caused by physicians who allegedly ordered unnecessary services in order to make themselves rich. HMO proponents argued that the solution to this alleged overuse was a new-fangled form of insurance company that controlled

the decision-making of doctors.

By the mid-1980s, the vast majority of health insurance companies were using one or both of the two tools pioneered by HMOs. By 1985 the two tools were collectively called “managed care.” Managed care was bound to fail for two reasons. First, it just isn’t possible for bureaucrats who aren’t doctors and who aren’t in the examining room to make better clinical decisions than doctors and patients do. Second, the bureaucrats hired by the HMOs to manage doctors and hospitals raised insurance company costs, and the clerks that doctors and hospitals had to hire to deal with the new managed care bureaucrats raised provider costs as well.

By the late 1990s, it was apparent even to formerly enthusiastic proponents of managed care that the great American HMO experiment had failed. George Lundberg, who promoted managed care during his tenure as editor of the Journal of the American Medical Association, revealed his disgust for managed care in a 2001 interview with the Los Angeles Times. “Managed care is basically over,” he said. “People hate it, and it’s no longer controlling costs. Healthcare inflation is now back in the double digits. So if it’s not saving money, then why should we have it? But like an unembalmed corpse decomposing, dismantling managed care is going to be very messy and very smelly, and take awhile.”

As it became clear even to the obtuse that managed care had failed, the insurance industry, with encouragement from Republicans, began to promote high-deductible policies as the solution to the US health care crisis. They called these high-deductible policies “medical savings accounts” in the 1990s, and then switched to the phrase “health savings accounts” (HSAs) in 2003. These insurance policies have annual deductibles on the order of $2,000 for individuals and $5,000 for families.

Repeating the mistakes of HMO proponents before them, HSA proponents have made the wrong diagnosis. Like HMO advocates, they claim overuse of medical services is the main problem. Unlike HMO advocates, they claim the overuse is caused by whiny, “overinsured” patients, not greedy doctors. Patients, we are told now, demand medical services they don’t need just because they have insurance with “low” deductibles (the deductible in a typical managed care policy these days is $500 for family coverage).

The argument that Americans overuse medical care is not a lie, but it is a half-truth, or better yet, a quarter-truth. The overuse argument ignores two facts: Underuse of medical care in the US is rampant, even among the insured; and the insurance and medical industries are dreadfully wasteful.

The latest data on overuse and underuse show that underuse occurs four times more often than overuse. For example, half of all insured Americans with high blood pressure are not being treated for it. For another example, a quarter of insured Americans who have been told their angiogram indicates they need bypass surgery or balloon angioplasty have neither procedure done. The truth is the average American underuses health care, and managed care and high deductibles will only make this problem worse.

The other fact concealed by HSA advocates is that the supply side of the US health care system – the insurance and medical industries – waste hundreds of billions of dollars on excessive administrative costs, redundant purchases of equipment such as MRIs, overcharging by specialists and drug companies, and fraud. It is this supply-side waste that America needs to address, and we cannot address it by exposing patients to $5,000 and hoping they will refrain from self-rationing and will arm-wrestle with their hospital or their drug manufacturer to bring their prices down.

America has just emerged from one dumb experiment – the managed care experiment – imposed upon us by our powerful health insurance industry. It now appears likely we will stumble into another stupid experiment – HSAs – brought to us by the US health insurance industry. But this experiment too will fail, and fail rather quickly. At that point, America may finally turn to single-payer system, or components of a single-payer system, that address the real cause of our horrendous healthcare costs – waste in the insurance and medical industries.Kip Sullivan sits on the steering committee of the Minnesota Universal Health Care Coalition. He is the author of The Health Care Mess, published by AuthorHouse, February 2006.

Red Pepper is an independent, non-profit magazine that puts left politics and culture at the heart of its stories. We think publications should embrace the values of a movement that is unafraid to take a stand, radical yet not dogmatic, and focus on amplifying the voices of the people and activists that make up our movement. If you think so too, please support Red Pepper in continuing our work by becoming a subscriber today.
Why not try our new pay as you feel subscription? You decide how much to pay.

Labour Party laws are being used to quash dissent
Richard Kuper writes that Labour's authorities are more concerned with suppressing pro-Palestine activism than with actually tackling antisemitism

Catalan independence is not just ‘nationalism’ – it’s a rebellion against nationalism
Ignasi Bernat and David Whyte argue that Catalonia's independence movement is driven by solidarity – and resistance to far-right Spanish nationalists

Tabloids do not represent the working class
The tabloid press claims to be an authentic voice of the working class - but it's run by and for the elites, writes Matt Thompson

As London City Airport turns 30, let’s imagine a world without it
London City Airport has faced resistance for its entire lifetime, writes Ali Tamlit – and some day soon we will win

The first world war sowed the seeds of the Russian revolution
An excerpt from 'October', China Mieville's book revisiting the story of the Russian Revolution

Academies run ‘on the basis of fear’
Wakefield City Academies Trust (WCAT) was described in a damning report as an organisation run 'on the basis of fear'. Jon Trickett MP examines an education system in crisis.

‘There is no turning back to a time when there wasn’t migration to Britain’
David Renton reviews the Migration Museum's latest exhibition

#MeToo is necessary – but I’m sick of having to prove my humanity
Women are expected to reveal personal trauma to be taken seriously, writes Eleanor Penny

Meet the digital feminists
We're building new online tools to create a new feminist community and tackle sexism wherever we find it, writes Franziska Grobke

The Marikana women’s fight for justice, five years on
Marienna Pope-Weidemann meets Sikhala Sonke, a grassroots social justice group led by the women of Marikana

Forget ‘Columbus Day’ – this is the Day of Indigenous Resistance
By Leyli Horna, Marcela Terán and Sebastián Ordonez for Wretched of the Earth

Uber and the corporate capture of e-petitions
Steve Andrews looks at a profit-making petition platform's questionable relationship with the cab company

You might be a centrist if…
What does 'centrist' mean? Tom Walker identifies the key markers to help you spot centrism in the wild

Black Journalism Fund Open Editorial Meeting in Leeds
Friday 13th October, 5pm to 7pm, meeting inside the Laidlaw Library, Leeds University

This leadership contest can transform Scottish Labour
Martyn Cook argues that with a new left-wing leader the Scottish Labour Party can make a comeback

Review: No Is Not Enough
Samir Dathi reviews No Is Not Enough: Defeating the New Shock Politics, by Naomi Klein

Building Corbyn’s Labour from the ground up: How ‘the left’ won in Hackney South
Heather Mendick has gone from phone-banker at Corbyn for Leader to Hackney Momentum organiser to secretary of her local party. Here, she shares her top tips on transforming Labour from the bottom up

Five things to know about the independence movement in Catalonia
James O'Nions looks at the underlying dynamics of the Catalan independence movement

‘This building will be a library!’ From referendum to general strike in Catalonia
Ignasi Bernat and David Whyte report from the Catalan general strike, as the movements prepare to build a new republic

Chlorine chickens are just the start: Liam Fox’s Brexit trade free-for-all
A hard-right free marketer is now in charge of our trade policy. We urgently need to develop an alternative vision, writes Nick Dearden

There is no ‘cult of Corbyn’ – this is a movement preparing for power
The pundits still don’t understand that Labour’s new energy is about ‘we’ not ‘me’, writes Hilary Wainwright

Debt relief for the hurricane-hit islands is the least we should do
As the devastation from recent hurricanes in the Caribbean becomes clearer, the calls for debt relief for affected countries grow stronger, writes Tim Jones

‘Your credit score is not sufficient to enter this location’: the risks of the ‘smart city’
Jathan Sadowski explains techno-political trends of exclusion and enforcement in our cities, and how to overcome this new type of digital oppression

Why I’m standing with pregnant women and resisting NHS passport checks
Dr Joanna Dobbin says the government is making migrant women afraid to seek healthcare, increasing their chances of complications or even death

‘Committees in Defence of the Referendum’: update from Catalonia
Ignasi Bernat and David Whyte on developments as the Catalan people resist the Spanish state's crackdown on their independence referendum